Proxmox bare metal vs debian reddit. 262K subscribers in the selfhosted community.

Proxmox bare metal vs debian reddit So much more lightweight than VMs. I've not worked with proxmox before and it looked a bit tricky. Everything else is Docker containers, which makes it shit-your-pants simple to keep up-to-date. So I thought I'd ask first and see if some of the disadvantages or advantages would push Usually you use Proxmox or any Hypervisor to run a pool of resources (multiple servers) and run multiple VMs for various use cases. Oddly enough it runs smoother than on bare metal lol. I’m running the latest ProxMox on Dell hardware (Xeon six core, 16GB RAM, onboard SATA with spinning platters, single disks, no RAID) and other VMs work fine, even Xpenology. I decided to bare metal my Debian NAS and Proxmox on NUC. Should I deploy TrueNAS as a proxmox VM, i was about to storm out the gates recommending bare metal docker with docker-swarm or kubernetes until i read you want windows as well. I got my hands on a lenovo x3250 m6 to replace my much older pfSense/bare metal install. It's a lot more work to do it I discovered a difference in the installed packages, between the Bare-metal ISO Installer and the install on top of Debian Wheezy. In a nutshell, Proxmox simply is a suite of utilities and a web UI running on top of minimal Debian 11. My username right now is really just my wife and I, mostly roku and phone. Install Proxmox (which I'm very familiar with) and put two instances of Debian on there (which I'm also very familiar with): one for files, one for media. ubuntu server with docker and ZFS bare metal + KVM I'm currently leaning towards the bare metal option since I have minimal need for VMs. The latter installs this additional packages: Not exactly the same situation, but I have a media center computer hooked to a TV and I ALSO wanted to use the machine for proxmox. It will net the sum of 2 drive with the 3rd used as parity. 1 kernel). I have run HAOS in a VM in Proxmox, and I have found HAOS in a VM to be less reliable than bare-metal. I’ve been a Plex pass user on bare metal for over 10 years. For immediate help and problem solving, Dell R710 Proxmox bare-metal VMs or CTs for mainly Plex and Truenas I’ve had it in unraid dockers, Debian on a nuc with dockers and docker-compose and bare install; Ive had raspberry pi, proxmox, the lot. I have a PC build with older (i7 6700k) but very capable hardware. e. Having TrueNas as bare-metal will allow me to setup VM’s and Docker containers from the system itself and allocate all resources where i want them. io on proxmox in debian VM. Advangates : I find this arrangement cool, uses very little resources and plenty of room for Proxmox host as read/write IO's is a responsibility of storage host. Software that runs on top of Debian. ) on bare-metal. I recently went through the headache of choosing the OS for my NAS again (rebuilding the pools and hardware) and made some inquiries here on Reddit on what to choose. So 3 12TB drives will give you 24 TB of usable storage. ESXi, Proxmox, Hyper-V) Type 2 Hypervisor - An app for creating/managing VMs, but needs a conventional bare metal OS to run on. You can virtualize it in Windows, but for learning Linux overall there's no real benefit (unless you want to learn Proxmox too). After that I'll be setting the rest up with Ansible, so will be using SSH keys, but that should be no the host operating system itself if you choose virtualization - truenas vs proxmox vs openmediavault vs unraid even separate computers vs all-in-one I started out with all-in-one unraid. straight from the mini PC with the HDMI port). Was thinking of Ubuntu Server LTS or ESXi, but having researched them I So I dual booted proxmox with my Win10 before completely getting rid of my Win10 Bare Metal install. Run a kubernetes cluster can be more cost effective on a Hypervisor than on bare metal. Although i wouldn't actually use debian personally, but that point is irrelevant, insert debian for which ever distro you want to use as a vm to host plex. This subreddit has gone Restricted and reference-only as part of a mass protest against Reddit's recent API changes, One of the VMs is a Debian Docker Host. Especially when you start using HA and clustering a Hypervisor may be more suitable. On my NAS box I also run bare metal and have everything running in docker. Debian vs Slackware? The biggest difference for you may be the user interface and the pre-installed software. For immediate help and Sounds like you're down to the choice between Proxmox with a NAS VM or TrueNAS bare metal. I tried it once and then I have to reinstall Proxmox CE. I also have proxmox installed on a different server. And i was wondering what would be the best option. I’ll offer a compelling reason for running a VM vs a container - live migrations. Proxmox is a great solution if you want to quickly spin up discreet VMs. Proxmox is that minimal OS that gives you most of the things an OS would give you but without the extra "stuff" a full blown OS brings, which in theory frees up more resources for allocation. For example, Titanfall 2 , I get 23ms in the baremetal install, I get around 46 to 50ms in the VM. So, if I understood it correctly. New server is a 1U, 1x E3-1270 v5 3. How could I achieve this? Thanks in Bare metal Debian with Apache, Certbot and LXC. When using Proxmox as a layer below a TrueNAS VM i could use these 40Gbps card, instead of the 10Gbps Intel ones in order to connect VM host and storage/Proxmox server. Proxmox has tons of documentation, forums, and guides online to do just about anything. We all use WireGuard on our phones & I use it to RDP into my workstation from client sites. The battle was Proxmox VS TrueNAS Scale. Since I can't I've recently switched from Proxmox OPNsense to hardware Protectli and an Arch box w/ Docker. I have run it in docker, supervised, unsupervised, bare metal in raspberry pi, etc. While Proxmox has additional enterprise features for VM management. Proxmox(on Debian), can run many Ubuntu (Computers/OS) with many containers (Docker). From a security perspective, disable all outside access but for ssh. In some cases it makes sense to install Proxmox VE on top of a running Debian Bullseye 64 Debian Buster is on 4. I'm setting up a Proxmox cluster as it just works easy, and has good HA capabilities. With proxmox you get the same concept as Docker on Ubuntu, but with an extra layer that allows for repeatable, and recoverable operations. Docker on LXC -> Oh Boy you will save lot of resources. I found Unraid to be a good middle ground between features and usability. The LXC containers are all roll-my-own/"manual" deployments of the following: I'm wondering about the pros and cons of Proxmox + Ubuntu vs bare metal Ubuntu for my use case. Whatever might be the "best" option is entirely up to you. How would such a system look like? First the storage Proxmox machine would have to boot, then the TrueNAS VM, and as final step the VMs on the main Proxmox VM host. While it lacks a web UI for NAS management, it's based on Debian and can be configured for NAS functionalities through the command line. I’ve gone for option 2; and it has been serving me well for a couple of years now. At the end of the day it made my life too complicated so I've ran another tests with bare metal OPNsense + unbound + Nginx Reverse Proxy. The 2 main benefits I see are: Easy reinstall of the VM if it crashes for some reason or if I want to change the OS to something else. This is strictly for personal use at home on my Odroid HC4 (an ARM board similar to RPi). apcupsd service installed on all systems - configured as master on NAS and as network client on other systems. Its not like a consumer PC where the SSD makes a huge difference because random stuff is being constantly read and writen. Reply reply Hi all, having some problems which I hope I can resolve because I REALLY want to run Proxmox on this machine and not be stuck with just OPNsense running on bare metal as it's infinitely less useful like this. I am wondering if there is any big performance difference between running multiple websites with docker and npm comparing to running docker and npm in bare metal. Proxmox was fine, but it felt like I needed to tinker more with settings in order to make it work how I want it. No issues at all, its a home lab so downtime is not an issue (providing my other half can eventually watch some stuff on the TV). Pass through the HD’s you want to use for Truenas + Apps (like Plex and all of the Arr’s) create zfs pools on pass through drives use 3 drives for each pool. 2. What I did was install debian as the OS on the HOST machine, I then installed plasma desktop on top of that, this gave me something similar to kubuntu which is what I normally use, but because I used debian as the I switched from proxmox to plain debian with HA and a bunch of other services as docker containers, including mqtt and frigate. A place to share, discuss, discover, assist with, gain assistance for, and The other option is to wipe Proxmox, install TrueNAS bare metal and setup all my VMs inside TrueNAS, but I'm not entirely sold on that since some have mentioned inconsistencies with TrueNAS's VM system (might be outdated info), and I like the idea of having my VM host independent of my file server OS (might also be based on outdated info). OMV wouldn’t install in a desktop environment so I installed Debian server. I would vote Proxmox just for having something to grow with if your needs change. However, if you do, it only makes sense to run LXC containers in proxmox. in Docker on bare-metal Debian. Also, I read that Webmin is no longer preferred and that it can interfere with CLI changes, is It's been generally smooth for me, and I'm entirely self-taught through internet tutorials. I’m planing to do the exact same move from running Unraid on bare metal to running it under Proxmox. I have been running everything bare metal with docker and docker compose for years. I'm debating between a bare metal Linux install of Ubuntu or something, vs proxmox and just firing up a VM in there. I want to replicate this setup in Proxmox efficiently. (good thing, I'll play my movies etc. My setup was different, as I always separate data and docker containers (where it sounds like you mix - such as Nextcloud files "mixed" in with your container config). I'm still a proxmox newbie, but I think I can manage the PCIe passthrough. An issue I've come across though, latency for my games is a lot higher in the VM than in the bare metal install. 5" SATA. I think you have enough horsepower you won't notice the difference between running Ubuntu or Debian headless or running Proxmox. The main thing that pulls me toward Proxmox is the ability to do something else without the fear of destroying that what already works. I wouldn’t rate hyper-v over proxmox to be honest, I feel HA on proxmox is slightly better to get set up just my opinion. Optimize Storage: I don't want to allocate huge, fixed virtual disks to VMs/CTs due to issues with trimming and wasted space. I want to use Proxmox as a virtualization level but I'm not sure if I should go bare metal or not. I run a three-node, non-HA Proxmox cluster. Doing a bit of benchmarking vs bare metal. ”Proxmox firewall” is debian firewall which is the same iptables found in millions of linux machines across multiple other distributions besides debian. After Proxmox is up and running I put the server version of Debian 10, with no frills, just SSH. 4. My bare-metal NAS is simply minimal Debian 11 with the Cockpit web UI. So why do you think that Debian kernels are newer? However, what other pros/cons are there of either approach? If you prefer First Proxmox is Debian with addons. They then add their own tooling, and web UI on top, and utilize other standard utilities like corosync, and ZFS. I run Docker for my I can't directly answer your questions or concerns, but AFAIK in principle Proxmox uses a sort of "hybrid" approach, where the OS/packages are Debian & the Kernel is Ubuntu. Install Docker and containerize everything. docker VM with nvidia p400 passthrough and ZFS on TrueNAS VM (allows CIFS mounts to work) proxmox option 3. It’s still running on “bare metal” and ends up being effectively the One issue I am currently struggling with is whether I should remove Proxmox and install Linux directly rather than as a VM. And since 24h it runs rock solid, and everything is OK. Hi All, I recently posted about creating a new Home Server and as a result have been looking at running Unraid as a VM in Proxmox but as both Unraid and Proxmox use KVM/Qemu I wonder what the performance difference would be between VM's running on each?. This subreddit has gone Restricted and reference-only as part of a mass protest against Reddit's recent API changes, One hybrid to consider would be to install Debian on bare metal with KVM for VMs, and docker/portainer for apps. The beauty of homelab-ing, is you can try everything you want and scrap it if you don’t like it. (i. I want to host about 20-50 VM's on it. Super easy migration. Before I used proxmox i had a Debian kvm /libvirt hypervisor, this was also fine but not as comfortable as proxmox from an hypervisor view. Running hassos in a vm on unraid has been an absolute dream. With proxmox you can use the proxmox gui to manage all of your lxc containers and vms and then you can use portainer to easily manage your docker containers. Either Docker on bare metal or Docker running inside of The difference in performance in bare metal vs virtualization on any moderately modern cpu will be negligible comparing to a fluctuation in your ISP network. I have one example that happened to me overnight — I added a few more VMs/LXCs yesterday and didn’t think about excluding them from my local backups (also I backup to a dedicated Proxmox Backup Server) so I ran out of disk space. Running Proxmox and then have TrueNas Scale as a VM. Install Proxmox and don't look back . Can’t do that with a container. Proxmox is the same way. Once proxmox is up and running most of the work should be done by the VMs/CTs. If you have used both did you notice a difference? If they are the same or very similar I might save myself the 20 votes, 14 comments. For example ESXi is labeled as a Type 1. I currently have a bare metal machine (on its last breath) that runs Ubuntu Server 20. I run Debian 12 + Proxmox on my main workstation as I only as part of a mass protest against Reddit's recent A Debian 11 CT uses less than a 100MB memory and extremely low cpu usage after installing pihole. Remote access to console and a You could also run docker directly on bare-metal Proxmox debian, This subreddit has gone Restricted and reference-only as part of a mass protest against Reddit's recent API changes, which break third-party apps and moderation tools. Thank you very much! Be This subreddit has gone Restricted and reference-only as part of a mass protest against Reddit's recent API If you are not thinking of using Proxmox in this way - you really should start over and install a Linux dist (debian/ubuntu/etc. Version Ok load Proxmox onto bare metal. Neither Debian 11 32 bit nor Raspberry Pi Desktop for PC (based on Debian 32 bit) will boot. I would love to have a full Linux machine on bare metal which I have never had before. Preferences are fine, but the reality is that Proxmox offers ZFS support and is based on Debian, and also supports NFS/SAMBA shares. I am toying with the idea of picking up an M920q with an i5 processor (6C/6T) and installing TrueNAS bare metal one this device. It's fine to use, most homelabs use only one machine and ZFS is built-in to proxmox. Mining Monero on Debian (Proxmox) you are running Proxmox and trying to mine inside of Windows\Linux virtual machines don't bother you will get awesome bare metal hash rates mining via the OS layer of Proxmox This subreddit has gone Restricted and reference-only as part of a mass protest against Reddit's recent API I had OPNsense on bare metal but then I decided to de clutter the comms cab, installed Proxmox on HP Gen8 Microserver and other stuff on it including OPNSense. Nextcloud is an application "suite", you can run it on either of the former, or on bare metal, but it does not compare. I run a 3-node PVE cluster at home plus a bare-metal PBS host. For immediate help and problem solving, Almost all of the lxc containers are ubuntu based. Update: fwiw I decided to install a linux distro on bare metal (I like certain things about Rocky/RHEL 9) and will go with openZFS and libvirt to manage storage and virtual machines. It just streamlines so much and avoids the layer of abstraction you will I personally run Proxmox, then have VMs for K8s, and was thinking of going that route. For immediate help and problem solving, Proxmox on bare-metal vs on top of Debian Proxmox is not a hypervisor. So, I went from debian (OMV) and docker on bare metal to proxmox a while back, so can at least go through how I've separated my data and docker/VMs. IMO, TrueNAS is overkill for simple file sharing. For my home server I have "upgraded" my mac mini to run Proxmox bare metal to run my VM's instead of running the VM's on OS X in VirtualBox. Tried Proxmox with both the stock 5. ). Is anyone here running Windows 11 as a Proxmox VM that has run benchmarks on how much performance loss is to be expected VS running it in bare metal? I'd like to have my new 4U server build be my main gaming machine but I'm also getting rid of my ancient 1U QNAP NAS and will go for a TrueNas setup running in a Proxmox VM. I just moved away from it on my router. Running VMs and Dockers on Unraid, running under proxmox is just adding layers and layers of unnecessary complexity to the situation. Had a period of Proxmox in between that and been fiddling with Proxmox on and off for labbing too. Running TrueNas through Proxmox will limit my machine resources. You’ll just install Debian and then Proxmox on top of that. I started with NextCloudPi installed, but then I moved to a bare metal installation as I wanted to try out an update before it was packaged for NextCloudPi. It's been running great on debian and I can manage it all through portainer / cockpit. In this case, testing on the Proxmox host system comparing to a Debian VM within (bookwork, 6. #2 is the reason I I am wondering, would I have better server performance if I used a bare-metal virtualization platform, such as Proxmox, and put both my ubuntu server and windows 10 installations in virtual machines? If so, do you have a recommendation for the virtualization platform? Thank you! I use VMware through my VMUG 365 evaluation license. I switched to proxmox and continued using zfs and have been very happy ever since. Install proxmox on bare server and run HASSOS and pihole container Install Ubuntu + kubernetes and run HASS and pihole containers. Running hass. 04 installation and create a virtual machine for use in Proxmox? I’d like to take my existing server and virtualize it so I can run another VM or two and do some other things with it. Proxmox on the bare metal; VM for Home Assistant (use the proxmox script to set it up - super simple; easy find using google “proxmox home assistant install script”) Separate VM for ZoneMinder Third VM for all my other docker containers. I also really like the idea to backup VM/Servers easily with Proxmox. I feel like I’m missing something simple. docker VM with nvidia p400 and HBA passthrough with ZFS on same VM bare metal option. XCP-ng is kind of middle ground: VMware turnkey-ness (compared to install Debian, then Proxmox and so on), more integrated (less tinkering, everything is going via its API) but also Open Source. Which of these would be eaiser and more reliable. I liked proxmox originally but prefer libvirt now that I'm used to it. practicalzfs. I read some people just use Debian + Cockpit or whatever or CasaOS? I can also use OpenMediaVault, especially since I already have Proxmox installed right now. But takes more resources. Proxmox is a hypervisor and so runs on bare metal. With the bare-metal installation, you'll get a complete operating system based on Debian GNU/Linux, 64-bit, a Proxmox VE kernel with KVM and container support, great tools for backup/restore and HA clustering, and much more The question is what should be on docker vs virtual machine vs bare metal For me; Bare Metal: Storage Server Home Automation (4 RS232, 2 RS485, USB Z-wave, dedicated net interface for many network applications) VM Server (xcp-ng) VM's: Docker Server Other stuff I want a windows or a dedicated network interface Ideally I wanted Proxmox on bare metal to move my Plex server from the Synology 1019+ and then it left me open to exploring, but I'll have a tinker on Debian 11 when it's up and running. Hey, I've a Ryzen 7 5700x PC Build + two old i5-5200U laptops that I'd like to use as a homelab Kubernetes Cluster. No, I cannot manage multiple clusters from the proxmox UI at one IP address. Proxmox doesn't get many CVEs, but that's not necessarily alone a basis to determine how secure a product is. I'm just not sure what other complications that will introduce to my OpnSense and networking learning curve. My next goal is to get Jellyfin running as an LXC container within Proxmox as well. Docker On VM -> Easy and recommended. For example running Proxmox, a Debian-VM and inside a docker container with for example a Terraria game server compared to just running it on bare metal Debian. I often see people in this sub talking about hosting multiple VM's, bare metal, using Proxmox or ESXi. I’ve read up on Proxmox, and will be using this as the bare metal OS. I have tested in LXC containers as well but for less headaches I chose VMs. Looking for feedback from the community on whether this is advisable and what advantages or disadvantages there might be to doing this. Not really. Never heard of UNRAID before, it looks v interesting, I'm guessing you could install Debian on the eMMC and use that as your root disk to get some use out of it. Am interested in the pros and cons of virtualized versus bare metal. If you just want a server to run docker containers then I'd recommend a Debian lite server with Cockpit webUI. CentOS, Debian but Windows as well, and if possible FreeBSD too. You can think of it as cutting out the giant OS middleman. Unless you need to run multiple operating systems, I recommend sticking with docker on plain debian. I'm thinking of switching to HA in docker but i haven't bothered to migrate all the add-ons yet. Windows vs Proxmox Since you are building a new box, I highly recommend trying Proxmox. To me your block storage is relatively set and forget, past the initial setup and occasional updates. I don't run pfSense on Proxmox personally (I run pfSense on bare metal) but I do run 3 VMs handling various tasks for my home-- Unifi controller, Octoprint, pihole, OpenMediaVault. Newly installed Proxmox installation. My main goal is easy recovery; if something happens, I'd like to be able to get up and running again - both files and media - in less than half an forget about proxmox. It's been plenty stable for me, especially compared to freenas. I have a bare metal Rocky Linux server that runs most of my containers and a few bare metal solutions. Proxmox excels when you want the containers on a single physical host to be on different VLANs/subnets. It uses Qemu/KVM, which essentially works like a type 1 hypervisor. I'm currently running ubuntu server bare metal on an almost identical macbook, and actually thinking about switching it to proxmox and clustering it with a pi and another old laptop I've got kicking around. I would run Plex and NextCloud in their own VMs on Proxmox. Convert existing ESXI server to Proxmox. I'm running 2 proxmox nodes right now, the first one has pretty much every service I'm running (jellyfin, arr stack, home assistant, truenas, etc) and the other one is just running a single debian VM with pterodactyl on it. I'm still torn between bare metal, docker, computer-machine • I have Debian Stable with Backports for kernel and btrfs-progs. 1) home assistant core 2) debian with docker for some containers i want to have separated from my main Rocky Linux server. This was a tough call between proxmox and a full os, but I'm more comfortable going this route I think. For immediate help and problem solving, Now that I've thought through it more; I may just drop kvm and run bare metal NixOS as a server. So there is different layers to be aware of. I really enjoy Proxmox and it served me really well in the past 3 years. I wanted to test things out first. I was on the same boat not too long ago. Edit: typos If virtualization is important: bhyve and jails aren’t anywhere even remotely close to being as useful and performant as kvm/qemu/proxmox or docker/lxc/kube if containers are your thing. I have only used windows before. com with If you don't feel comfortable installing Proxmox bare metal then you should install it in a VM and play around with it before. If you're talking about the TurnKeyLinux ones, those are in fact based on Debian. Honestly the installation is very straightforward and you don't need to be very familiar with linux to use it as most of the operations can be done through the GUI. There is probably very little difference in performance, so again now down to things like the ease of spinning up VMs and containers, etc. You can also do the other way around with TrueNAS bare metal and VMs for the rest since TrueNAS supports VMs. This also sets up a service user with preconfigured SSH keys and passwordless sudo access to allow Ansible to configure the system further I have two options at this point: I can use the 6800K system for TrueNAS bare metal, and still use the R710 + 970 for Plex inside of Proxmox, but, given the 6800K is faster than the dual L5640’s in the R710, I was considering using that system as the Bare metal (WIN10) or Proxmox? 12 SAS bay,128GB machine running BI on KVM to bare metal i7 w/32GB. Similarly, restoring those backups onto other Proxmox hosts is super easy if all hosts mount the same NFS storage. If you choose to stay on proxmox, you can create a LXC and run docker. Install the bare minimum on If you have a ProxMox server dedicated to you, it is one of two ways: bare metal or as a virtual machine in someone's virtualization environment. I hope this question makes sense. 6GHz 4C/8T and 32 GB DDR4, and I cant shake the idea of running proxmox and do pfSense virtualized. I only use separate LXC for stuff like Plex that can benefit from extra few percent performance or something thats easy enough or is more flexible to install and maintain manually compared to docker. Keep in mind that Proxmox is essentially a Debian computer, so anything you need to do with a Proxmox host can be googled by replacing Proxmox with Debian to get quite a bit more results. Good luck! Build a NAS PC with a bare-metal OS and my various drives. g. Obviously, there's also many other aspects, like pro support quality, ecosystem and such. The amazing UIs of Proxmox and TrueNAS are appreciated, but in the long run, get in my way. According to the link provided "The client-only repository should be usable Bought a mini pc to run Proxmox bare metal but the storage is emmc which PM hates. Only thing I can’t wrap my head around is which install method do I follow to get Jellyfin? If I could go with Esxi as it used to be, I'd do that. The source code of Proxmox VE is licensed under the GNU AGPLv3 and free to download and use. Try both and see what you like best. For me it crashes once every month or two and the vm has to be rebooted. I also have a QNAP, but I want to build the FreeNas for backups and keep the QNAP for normal storage. Bare metal every time It's only worth doing it in proxmox if you want to try something first and you already have a full proxmox setup up and working. It's Debian but that matters not for virtualization. Nice. Minor things change, but a lot of the core concepts transfer easy) For Proxmox, it's a hypervisor and should be out on bare metal. So I have been running Truenas Scale on bare metal but am considering moving it to a Proxmox node to allow for HA and better utilize my hardware. Proxmox is also much more mature as a hupervisor. Which technically by definition would make it a Type 2 hypervisor. If you were going for like a beagle board or something and needed every drop of compute power I would be more careful in your OS choice. It's more comparable to VMWare's vsphere than docker, i. Bare-metal provisioning software? Hi. The backup functionality is also very easy. More an appliance than a "general" distro if you prefer. the experience has been overwhelmingly more controlled than having a bare metal windows box attached to the tv even a small desire to try it, just do it). Load Truenas Scale as a VM in Proxmox. One good option (for me) is keeping NVMe drives under Proxmox and pass through the SATA controller to the NAS OS. Any thoughts on the most efficient, cleanest, most reliable way to achieve my goals? Thanks all! Overall, I don't think you will notice a difference. Currently using a Synology NAS but it’s not a great solution for transcoding video It’s a great solution for audio (plexamp) I’m sure this is 100% opinion but, should I virtualize it with ProxMox or run it bare metal for the best performance? Current Internet: Fiber 1Gbps Up/Down About 5 users on average, streaming, 1 working. Typical docker + portainer + portainer agent installation on debian runs under 150 MB. These are used for managing native Linux capabilities like virtual networking and Kernel-based Virtual Machines (KVMs). 04 with Webmin. My DIY, bare-metal, NAS is minimal Debian 11 with Docker Engine running 20 containers including Jellyfin and accompanying server apps. I suspect was either from the NFS or something else. Proxmox is a Linux distribution. The corosync configuration is somewhat limited when it comes to a larger number of nodes in a I’m looking at installing Proxmox and wondering if it is possible to take an existing bare metal Ubuntu 20. I got these mysterious grey question marks on Proxmox that I could not figure out what causes it. I’m glad I started with it because I could test out different routing solutions in VMs, but now it’s bare metal. 5" SAS versus WD Reds in 3. Otherwise, when setting up a container from scratch, you're free to use any of the distros Proxmox supports, including Alpine. This machine currently just has windows on it. I would not run Plex or NextCloud as plug-ins on this PC. For a while, one of the nodes ran a NAS VM using an HBA and PCI passthrough; however, I recently added another Proxmox node and migrated the NAS to a bare-metal install. I run proxmox as my main gaming pc in the lounge. My argument against option 1 is that if someone else needed to come in and look at the system (or even you later on), nothing in the proxmox ui would indicate that docker was installed, and the performance metrics would become confusing bc there would be some amount of resource usage not accounted for. I'd prefer a more flexible solution. Proxmox is built on Debian. There will be a little added complexity in setting it up because you will need to pass through the drives that you will use to the VM. So far I love my setup now the best. Is there a special reason why you want unraid? Is there a special reason why you consider using proxmox? Running one is best for performance, running both at once will give you less performance and open the doors for a lot of potential PXE Boot the bare-metal host to the Debian installer, with a preconfigured Preseed file to automate the debian installer questions (initial network config, hostname, disk partitions, etc). Only thing I had that caused a problem was using watchtower to manage other docker containers but that was easily replaced with other options that don’t cause my install to be unsupported. Basically I’ll combine 2 small servers into currently have (one runs Proxmox the other Unraid) into a single more capable / modern one. You can achieve the same installation by installing Debian and then installing proxmox VE (whichever version is intended for your Debian version). As a Proxmox/HA OS sceptic I have been very happy with Debian + Supervised install. Regardless, it shouldn't take 5 mins to boot Proxmox either IMO the potential for customization and automation is the main reason I've been using the Debian + Proxmox route. Any time you have to shutdown/reboot your VM host it means OMV is down too, and that storage is unavailable. My choices are: Proxmox and then Debian VM to run snapRaid+mergerFS+Plex, or Debian or Ubuntu, and then install proxmox as level 2 hypervisor, on which I will spin up a Debian VM to run snapRaid+mergerFS+Plex. TrueNas I had to dig through 8 forum posts to figure out APT was disabled when I tried to install PBS. If I 1. For immediate help and problem solving, please join us at https://discourse. Get yourself an ssh key -> don't use I imagine you could - I run proxmox in hyper-v on windows servers pretty often. Also, what would you do? Thanks! I've been running various forms of NextCloud over the last two years. e. It hinders with proxmox. . Whichever way, as 'direct access', you have a proxmox machine instance dedicated to you. How large would be the overhead for the machine. I had nothing but issues with it. It's not as hard as I thought it would be that's why I ditched Proxmox. PVE #1 backs up a CT, PVE #2 restores the CT. I’ve personally run both hypervisors on bare metal. Proxmox on bare-metal vs on top of Debian upvotes This subreddit has gone Restricted and reference-only as part of a mass protest against Reddit's recent API changes, which break third-party apps and moderation tools. proxmox option 2. Parallels, VirtualBox) Under the hood (way down then stacking on layers ) KVM KVM (Kernel-based VM) is type 1 hypervisor and is used in Linux to give bare metal resources to VMs. Used to use proxmox at home but I use VMware at the office so thought meh why not. 5 mins boot time feels odd unless you're adding Proxmox boot time to it as well. APC Back-UPS RS 1500 monitored by NAS through USB. Hence you install Proxmox and then install HAOS and other VMs/containers inside This subreddit has gone Restricted and reference-only as part of a mass protest against Reddit's recent API changes, which break third-party apps and moderation tools. Good morning all. I have seen people talk about proxmox and other virtual machines, how complicated is it to get that running? I run OMV on Proxmox with physical disks mapped to the omv vm, i can not notice any performance difference to a bare metal installation if this is what you mean with experience. I rarely need VMs so when I do I I've runned some tests this week end with Proxmox and ran into some difficulties between the host and VMs. But I like the LXC containers that Proxmox supports, So my Docker VM is only used You can run both on Proxmox. It would take a bit more setup, but you’d have a well segmented system that would be easy to update, resistant to config conflicts, and easy to backup. Run OMV in a VM and pass your drives through to it to manage. If you are not 100% sure about what your final configuration will be, Proxmox allows for the flexibility of trying different NAS management OS without having to go through a bare metal reinstallation every time. The (bare metal) drives could be managed and RAID array created by Proxxmox itself, and as a logical unit attached to a VM or container to be used by? That's interesting. Works great going on 3 years. Proxmox uses Debian stable with KVM (Linux built in virtualization) and qemu. So I see no reason why Proxmox wouldn't work, but from everything I've seen here, I think it will! Docker on Server Node -> Should be no go. The only difference being the VM > The installation of a supported Proxmox VE server should be done via bare-metal ISO installer. Migrate my arr stack*:* I used to run Sonarr, Radarr, etc. It's not really a Linux distribution since your not using the os whatsoever, it's so minimal that it's considered itself a type 1 hypervisor. I’ll occasionally go to a docker or even truenas for secondary Plex servers (guest access, testing, etc) but my primary has typically been bare metal. I am not opposed to learning something new as long as the learning curve is gradual. Proxmox host and Storage are connected on a dedicate network and interface. The "bare Proxmox is Debian under the hood, so the difference isn’t all that big. 262K subscribers in the selfhosted community. All great and x10 faster than a Pi :) Also run like a dozen services in another VM with docker, no issues. Should I stick to Proxmox + TrueNAS or should I just use OMV or Barebone for this backup Proxmox is fine if you have 2-5 hosts. When installed in a Proxmox VM, this control is best achieved using and HBA and PCI Passthrough, which must be supported by both the motherboard and the CPU. And that at the end of the day Proxmox is a Debian under the hood. Apache is setup as a reverse proxy for the services running in containers and to allow everything to be hosted with https. And if you wrap a script to do that with virsh then you can create your own templatizing scripts for vms if you need to do it often. I'd use debian over ubuntu, but not for a nas or hypervisor, in your use case i'd use debian as another vm on proxmox to host plex and such. 6 with minimal variations. Much happier. Like i have today or Running TrueNas Scale as bare-metal host. I was wondering If I should go bare-metal or make some VMs using Proxmox or any other virtualization tool and install my cluster on top of these VMs. But Proxmox is easy to get started with if you want to go that route. 2. TrueNas seems iffy to me, wasn't a fan of the setup and trying to understood the pool thing. Granted, containers boot quickly but it’s still a reboot. Advice between bare metal hypervisor or some kind of linux QEMU or Docker images etc. Cockpit is an excellent web UI, but also stays out of the way. I run several dozen hosts on my proxmox cluster without issues. maybe put jellyfin Type 1 meaning it's basically the OS itself (runs on bare metal), and Type 2 meaning it runs on top of an OS. In future if required I can add one more Proxmox Host without worrying for its storage. 19, Proxmox VE on 5. Esxi was nice, Proxmox is a PITA, and Docker is easier since I don't have to worry about a bare metal hypervisor for OPNsense. more "bare metal", less system overhead. I’m able to move my VMs around from Proxmox host to host without ever experiencing any downtime. You run Proxmox/openstack on the hardware (usually several bare metal machines) and it gives you the tools to manage them as a "pool" of resources. install just debian on bare metal and put HA os with a virtual box (or something similar) and pass iGPU from there. Stuck Newbie on Proxmox vs Unraid This subreddit has gone Restricted and reference-only as part of a mass protest against Reddit's recent API changes, which break third-party apps and moderation tools. I run OMV on Proxmox with physical disks mapped to the omv vm, i can not notice any performance difference to a bare metal installation if this is what you mean with If I understand you correctly, the HA OS image directly on NUC and the HA OS in a VM using Proxmox, is exactly the same instance of Home Assistant (performance, looks, options etc. What Proxmox gives is real easy flexibility to spin up a VM or a LXC with little effort. (Edit: forgot to mention that there's a lot of similarities between distros too. On the proxmox, I only have 2 running vm's. Now for the rant about TrueNas. So you will notice a difference between storing your VMs/CTs on a SSD vs not. The cpu overhead is <3% with kvm (assuming you didn’t get your cpu from an antique shop). It's now running all my (Linux) VM's and many Docker containers without any issues bare metal in Proxmox and Docker. I could easily define what I need in Nix; no VMs needed. The Proxmox ISO makes a number of assumptions about partition layouts, network configuration, and user accounts that differ from the way I set my cluster up. I was going to just build a regular bare metal windows PC but, since I've been spending a lot of time over the last month getting familiar with proxmox, I've seen a few videos recently on passing through the gpu to a windows VM and treating it as though it's a bare metal install while still getting all of the benefits of a proxmox host. The thing is though, I'm not actually sure why I would need multiple VM's or OS's. I personally prefer this solution for three reasons. I've had Plex on an SSD, harddrives with ssd cache drive, right now it's on a couple mirrored 10k drives with a small caching ssd that I was thinking of moving metadata over to, but before I work on any more experiments I'd like to solve the stability issues, which probably means also documenting what This subreddit has gone Restricted and reference-only as part of a mass protest against Reddit's recent API changes, Installing Proxmox on top of a bare metal pfSense is a bad idea, if not impossible I find it easier to set up partitioning and other storage the way I like it using bare Debian, then install Proxmox on that. "Setup wifi on proxmox" > "Setup wifi on debian" Debian is a distribution, it is as bare metal as you can get because you are running on top of the boot manager, it is by every definition, the Operating System layer If you use a hypervisor like virtualbox or qemu/kvm which is what proxmox uses for vm, that is another layer on top of the operating system I do have an HP DL380-G6 with Proxmox, but I prefer not to have it running 24x7 plus drives for it are expensive for large capacity 2. My plan is to then spin up a VM to run Home Assistant OS (found a guide on how to do this). If you are going to run a full VM in that setup, you'd run it on the Hyper-v host, not proxmox. I highly doubt you need ubiquiti dream machine. Yes virtualization adds overhead, and I know that. I prefer bare metal because I don’t tinker with it in the same way that I do with my Proxmox server. Yet it's a software stack that runs on Linux. Proxmox will teach you about Debian as well as virtualization. I have a super simple setup: 10gb port out on my ISP router (Bell Canada GigaHub) and PPPoE credentials Three-node Proxmox VE cluster + bare-metal Proxmox Backup Server + bare-metal Hyper-V server + bare-metal DIY NAS (Debian-based). In Proxmox, I typically have two physical NICs available. But am I testing a more modular approach of using TrueNAS on one computer for storage, and proxmox on a more powerful machine for virtualization. I installed Proxmox Backup Client on my NAS and use PBS for backups. Seeking Advice: Best Setup for Nextcloud Instance on Proxmox (VM vs LXC, Debian vs Ubuntu, Docker vs No Docker) Hello Nextcloud community! I'm currently in the process of setting up my Nextcloud instance on a Proxmox server and would love I have some old laptops laying around and I wonder would it be better to use a bare metal hypervisor such as VMware EXSi/vSphere, or install a host OS such as debian to host my stuff? What do yall do with your servers that have 10GB or less memory? Proxmox can run both VMs and containers. Thanks for any input. Not ideal for 30, 50, 100 hosts. There are features I wish proxmox had. I need to retire my Portainer/docker daemon in favor of something declarative. I've been hosting my own Ubuntu server for a while now, but I would like to try something new. x Kernel and also the upgraded 6. I think the mini PC is pretty beefy to run this tasks tho. This subreddit has gone Restricted and reference-only as part of a mass protest against Reddit's recent API changes, which break third-party apps and moderation tools. gapvfk bik xlgn chcr jefy ckxm ejpmp mdmgee aseug vjcw