Your submission has passed the technical checks and is now in peer review. I have experienced a confusing situation.

Your submission has passed the technical checks and is now in peer review 5. When you re-submit a peer-graded assignment, peer reviews and grades for your first submission will be deleted. In the Peermark Assignments section, you can see the title of the assignment, the start date, due date and the post date (which indicates when you will be able to access the reviews made of your paper). Hence, this is perhaps the most time-consuming part of the entire publication process. ’ However, 14 days later, it changed to ‘Reviewers Invited. The journal has received the submission and is conducting an initial editorial assessment and screening for technical requirements. 10. If a manuscript passes these checks, the journal editor or managing editor will consider if the manuscript is worth moving ahead. I haven't Review: This is where the peer review happens, as well as any revisions required by the author. Sharing peer review history enriches the scientific record, increases transparency and accountability, and helps to reinforce the validity of your research by displaying the The journal has received the submission and is conducting an initial editorial assessment and screening for technical requirements. ” It implies that the reviews for your paper have come in and the editor can now make a decision on your paper. Independent researchers in the relevant research area assess submitted manuscripts for originality, validity and significance to help editors determine whether the manuscript should be published in their journal. Subscribe and get curated content that will give impetus to your research paper. See our privacy policy for more information on the use of your personal data. Find out how to check the status of your submission and the average time to first decision. . What is peer review and why is it Authors have the option to opt in to In Review directly from the submission system of participating journals. After major revision we have submitted the manuscript back and it went to with editor to under review after one day and to required reviews completed after 2 weeks and then again to under review after 1 day. The response to reviewers is After you submit your manuscript, we'll check that it complies with Nature Research editorial and publishing policies. 0 license and a DOI, becoming a permanent part of the scholarly record. If your paper has been rejected prior to peer review due to lack of subject fit, then find a new journal to submit your work to and move on. As about 40 days have passed from the time of the submission to the time of the status change, it probably means that your article has been sent for peer review. Verify that all elements of your submission are organized and according to author instructions. This stage can last from a couple of minutes Select the name of the assignment that you are to review. What does this 'Under Review' status mean? 目前同样的状态，1个月前投出去，过了一个月从in peer review (ae: not assigned)变回了submitted (ae: not assigned)。 我看有的人的下一个状态是in peer review (ae: assigned)，希望有个好结果 An Els evier report from 2018 identified three tasks in the peer review process that could use automation: Match a manuscript with a suitable candidate reviewer ’s qualifications and interest ; Remove candidates who Around 10 weeks ago I submitted a manuscript to Scientific Reports. Does "Under Review" mean that the paper has passed the editorial check and been given to the external reviewer? The single-blind and double-blind systems have continued to be the most common forms of evaluating articles, with a tendency to use the single-blind format in the biomedical and natural sciences, and a the double-blind system more frequently in the social sciences and humanities [85, 113, 114]. Once a paper is submitted to a journal, authors eagerly wait for the editorial decision. Sent Back to Author. From your query, it seems reviewers have been assigned for your manuscript. The first update, ADM: [a person’s name], means that the manuscript was first in administrative (shortened to ‘ADM’) processing, which is the typical first stage after submission. Does that mean desk rejection, or is there a chance that it can still undergo the peer review process? The turnaround time (TAT) for this journal is 2. Anyone involved in peer reviewer must first accept the invitation to review your manuscript. Submission to first editorial Authors are aware of the peer reviewers’ names during the peer-review process and vice versa. ’ So far, so good. :-) This may have been necessary in case yours was a major revision. We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us. The reviews were completed by 23rd March. The status “Under Review” indicates that So, they must have sent it for this check, and now, the manuscript seems to have cleared this check. ’ One week later, it was ‘Under review. Two days later, it changed to ‘Assigning for review. Check the quality of your writing - Free Language check ; General formatting rules for all article types The following summary describes the peer review process for this journal: Identity transparency: Single anonymized. Describe the major revisions to your manuscript in your response letter followed by point-by-point responses to the comments raised. Address all points raised by the editor and reviewers. Round 2 peer reviews are blinded. You ran the experiments and wrote up the results. Any product which will be sold gifted or used by an avatar must be Peer Reviewed. Several peer I have submitted my paper to one of the springer journal. ” The assigned editor can now take a call on whether to send your manuscript for peer review. Once an article has passed the initial screening process, it’s sent for peer review. There are three things that happen to a manuscript between submission and editorial decision: the Technical Check, the Review Cycle, and the Editorial Review. Peer review is a positive process. As an editor, you’ll appreciate the amount of effort that goes into the peer review process. If the editor is satisfied, they will initiate the peer review process by choosing and contacting appropriate peer reviewers to evaluate the PLOS is a mission-driven open science publisher covering all scientific disciplines with a focus on fundamental and applied research across life, health, sustainability, engineering, and technology. Stage 2: Editor assigned. Users with permission to Perform Technical Check can follow a journal specific checklist to determine if the submission Review invitations sent: 2+ Checking the submission status from the journal editorial system also showed "Required Reviews Completed" with the same date of 16th of April. W hen you choose a PLOS journal you are putting integrity first and supporting an organization committed to research that is robust, reliable, and We oversee this process to ensure that your manuscript contains everything our editors and peer reviewers need to perform a fair and thorough assessment of your work. Note the number “1” in the image below. As per the normal journal processes, the editor first conducts an initial screening of the manuscript. If your 大噶猴，这里是专注学术科研的InVisor芳老师！ 写过论文或已经发表过论文的朋友，想必都见过Peer review这个字眼了，但是还有很多论文小白对这个概念感到陌生。那今天呢，芳老师就来给大家科普下这个论文发表过程中的常见环节，它 Learn about the steps your paper goes through after submission, from technical checks to peer review, and the possible editorial decisions you may receive. The status “With editor” Preprints will be posted after they pass the journal’s initial submission checks, prior to peer review. edu Offer When this happens, your submission returns to Under Review status. The editors' decision can take several weeks as they may consult peer reviewers. Thereafter, reviewers are assigned/invited for An article is considered to have been sufficiently reviewed when it has received two peer review reports. This may be the case if one/some of the changes they asked for are very technical. IEEE Access has a typical acceptance rate of about 30%, which is 2) If your submission has entered the Peer Review process, this status means that a recommendation has been made on your submission and the Editor in Chief is assessing this recommendation in order to make their decision. Peer review is vital to the quality of published research. Environmental Earth Sciences is an international multidisciplinary journal concerned with aspects of interaction between humans, natural resources or unique geographic zones, and the solid earth: -Ground water and soil contamination caused by waste management and disposal practices -Environmental problems associated with transportation by land or This peer review collaborative template aims to address the growing need for structured peer review combining all best practices and advice on peer reviews. Technical Check. is appropriate to send out to peer review, they will then choose two or When Technical Check workflow is activated: New/Revised submissions of the configured article types appear in the folders 'New/Revised Submissions' until Technical Check is done. Anonymization Checks. Usually when a paper is received for publication, the Editor in chief considers the paper and then transmits it to the suitable I will take that as a good sign or start. Peer Review can also be triggered if the Creator changes an item its rating or its. Seamlessly integrate technical checks in your submission system workflow with our fast, secure, and scalable API. There are many people involved, including: You as an editor; A team of associate editors; An administrator; The reviewers; Editorial board After peer review and reviewer reports received the status change to initial submission passed technical check. Services Pricing . Use this information From my experience, it is usually 1-3 days. Next Steps The peer review process is essential for quality checks and validation of journal submissions. ’ Delays may be a bit longer if the Managing Editor needs to double-check any information. Revising. Awaiting Editor Assignment: Multiple editors may be assigned to your submission, depending on the journal's workflow. Locate the submission in Submission Requiring Author Approval or Revisions Requiring Author Approval, and see here for more details. Required reviews complete Improve the chances of your manuscript’s acceptance by learning how to prepare a manuscript for journal submission and handle the peer review process. In most courses, there’s no penalty for resubmitting (except for some Degree and MasterTrack courses). ’ My manuscript's status changed from 'With Editor' directly to 'Decision in Process' in a week, and it has remained so for over two weeks. I received a relatively long list of changes that were confusing and contradictory. but all references to the journal submission and its peer review timeline are deleted. I will be bit hopeful now. Under review: The handling editor has invited peer reviewers to evaluate the submission. The paper is assigned to editor" means that your paper has passed the initial screening of the administration and will be send further to reviewer,s remark. The system will also immediately post a preprint of your manuscript to the In Review section of Research Square, in easy-to-read HTML, and with a citeable DOI. This refers to the internal check by the journal, for basic aspects such as novelty of the research, quality of the writing, scope match, and adherence to the journal After submission, the status first indicated that the editor has been assigned. Submission has been approved by the author and is awaiting a formatting check by AMS staff. The peer-review process can appear intimidating and complex. I submitted a paper on April 8. To opt in, all co-authors agree to have their manuscript posted as a preprint with a CC-BY 4. Reviewer Identities reviewer opt in. Peer reviewers are busy scientists, and peer review is an honorary service that requires detailed scrutiny and evaluation The status of my manuscript is showing Decision in Process for almost two months. What are the possible reasons? In this case, however, it appears that peer review has taken place, and the editor How to pass it: It comes down to submitting the right manuscript to the right publication. Peer reviewers are busy scientists, and peer review is an honorary service that requires detailed scrutiny and evaluation of the manuscript. Linked to the development of the scientific method as described by Francis Bacon in Novum Organum in 1620, peer review was instigated in the mid-18 th century by Royal Societies in the UK, with the Philosophical Transactions of the Royal This stage indicates that your paper has not yet been sent for peer review. The manuscript peer review process helps ensure scientific publications are credible and minimizes errors. I submitted a manuscript to an Elsevier journal on September 2. This involves finding an editor When you submit a research manuscript for peer review, the journal may report the status of the review as “in review” or “under review”. On the occasion that a reviewer withdraws from the process, the Editorial Team will begin the reviewer selection process again. It may be that one journal uses the term “in review” and another the term “under review”, both to signify the same thing: that your In this article, we will provide a step-by-step guide to help researchers better understand and navigate the peer review process. Now you’ve identified a journal to submit to, there are a few things you should be familiar with before you submit. Kindly suggest what can be done in this regard. After half a day, the status changed to ‘Under Review. If you have received the submission confirmation, you may expect the submission status to be changed to something like ‘with Editor’ or ‘under review’ soon. The template has been pre-tested These checks happen before the manuscript reaches the editor or reviewers. The paper is under second revision but first technical revision. Author/reviewer communication; We welcome your feedback on this Peer Review Taxonomy Pilot. Awaiting Editor Decision. Independent researchers in the relevant research area assess submitted manuscripts for originality, validity and significance to help Editors determine whether the manuscript should be published in their journal. The trouble started at the initial technical check. Your new or revised submission has been sent back by the Editorial Team for changes prior to review. It passed the initial evaluation 10 days later. Thanks. Creators may also choose to self-submit any item for review. remember that your submission form is your friend and can help you simplify and even eliminate many common technical check OE 投稿状态显示 in peer review，送外审了吗当OE投稿状态显示为"in peer review"时，意味着编辑已经收到了论文并安排了同行评审。这意味着论文已经被送到了专家评审小组或评审专家手中，开始进行评审过程 The Editor Assigned status typically means that your manuscript has cleared the initial check (for basic aspects such as adherence to the journal’s guidelines and a scope match) and has now been assigned to an Associate Editor (AE). * Sent Back to Author Submission does not pass a formatting check and requires author corrections. Once your manuscript passes the initial quality check, we assign it to a member of Editorial Board, who is an active researcher in your field. Consequently manuscript rejections rates, peer-review requests, and subject-editors' workloads are mounting. Till then, it is showing "Decision in Process". We trust you would have seen our responses to your earlier queries around this paper, here and here, along with the related resources we provided as links in the initial response. The first stage involves an initial check when the manuscript is examined to make sure it is readable, formatted properly and that the necessary declarations have been made. In this interactive module, we walk you through the individual steps that need to be completed before the manuscript is Certain publications have a Technical Check process all submissions to the journal must go through. At the submission stage, authors may indicate a These checks happen before the manuscript reaches the editor or reviewers. Hope this The editorial and peer review process will continue through the peer review systems as usual. Required reviews complete 5. Before you submit. Peer reviewers are experts who volunteer their time to help improve the journal manuscripts they review—they offer authors free advice. Journals with following an open or transparent peer review model will share the identities of the reviewers with the author(s). Making your submission . You can use In Review to access up-to-date information on where your article is in the peer review process. ”这个阶段两个月了，想问下大家这是已经送审的意思吗？ 一个多月了，显示Your submission has passed the technical checks and is now in peer review Please check your inbox to see whether you have received a confirmation of the successful completion of your submission along with the manuscript number and submission ID. The editor will carefully evaluate the comments from the peer reviewers and examine the manuscript, and they may also consult with the reviewers again for clarity. Decision in process: The peer-review of your article has been completed, and the decision letter will be emailed to you shortly. The fact that your paper has been considered for and sent for peer 8、Technical Check in Progress：检查稿件是否符合期刊投稿要求，如格式文件是否齐全、是否抄袭、作者邮箱是否有效等。 9、Under Review：表示审稿人已接受审稿，目前正在审稿中，这是一个漫长的等待过程（期刊一般限定审稿人审稿时间为1个月左右） The journal office is identifying potential editors to handle the submission. Since the status of your paper changed to "under review" half a day after being "with editor," I'm inclined to think that "under review" in this case refers to the initial editorial screening. I submitted a manuscript to a Springer journal. The peer review process has an education element, and customarily, journals send the views of all reviewers to the authors with useful advice on how their manuscript could be improved. So: you worked hard on your paper. The editor sends a decision email to the author including any relevant reviewer comments. We oversee this process to ensure that your manuscript contains everything our editors and peer reviewers need to perform a fair and thorough assessment of your work. Hi, it depends from the Journal but normally you can wait more days. Thanks for writing in again. If you unfairly received a 0 or a low grade from a peer: Try re-submitting your assignment so other learners can review and grade it. Again, as you would well know, Nature Physics is a very well-established journal receiving a lot of manuscripts regularly, which takes time processing. Here we outline common problems with manuscript submissions and propose If you see this status, your submission has passed the technical check, and the editorial team is selecting an editor. SUBMISSION AND PEER REVIEW CHECKLIST. When the editorial office During peer review, reviewers will be able to access your manuscript securely using our online system, whilst maintaining referee anonymity. The peer review history package includes the editorial decision letter for each revision, with reviews, and your responses to reviewer comments, including attachments. Under Review: This status means that the manuscript is under peer review. You can also see the point value in the Marks Available field as well as the number of reviews you have Under Review: This status means that the manuscript is under peer review. Peer review helps to maintain high standards for published research. When revising your manuscript and responding to peer review comments: Peer-review is the system used to assess the quality of a manuscript before it is published. " Today the status was changed to "Decision in progress. With editor: The manuscript has been placed with a member of the editorial board for handling. They claim to make a first decision in a maximum of 45 days. Carefully investigate the journal’s scope before submitting to ensure that your manuscript has a good chance of publication. Those that are accepted move to the next stage. Peer review is the system used to assess the quality of a manuscript before it is published. Peer-review policy Manuscript transfers your publication Submission guidelines Our 3-step submission process. I had submitted the revised paper around 16th March 2023. Tasks Your Tasks are available from the top left menu of your Dashboard. Now the status of Before initiating the digital editorial management process, review your submission requirements checklist. Required reviews complete Based on 18+ years of editorial intelligence and advanced AI technology, R Pubsure gives you with a fast, objective, and in-depth review of your paper before you get ready to submit it to the journal. Your submitted article will be evaluated by at least two independent reviewers. 7. By accepting optional cookies, you consent to the processing of your personal data - including transfers to third parties. With some, it refers to the internal (journal) review; with others, it refers to the peer review. The status of your paper has changed to ‘Required Reviews Completed. Dear Dr Miatmoko, Re: "The Effect of 1,2-Dioleoyl-3-Trimethylammonium Propane (DOTAP) Addition on the Physical Characteristics of. Working efficiently with a plan is the key that will help submission, but no changes should be made to the preprint version while your manuscript is under evaluation) This checklist is provided to help you prepare your submission. It should not be submitted along with your manuscript Please check the manuscript submission guidelines for the journal to which you are submitting for all the full list of If you recommend peer review, then please pass the ‘Assess suitability’ task and send a message with your rationale to the in-House Editor using the discussion tool in Snapp, tagging the editor in the message by typing “@” and selecting their name. Once the editor has accepted the invitation, the manuscript status will change to “Editor assigned. When revising your manuscript and responding to peer review comments you must: Thank the reviewers and editors for their time and comments. As the corresponding or submitting author, you can track the progress of your article online via Your research (login required). Comments will be anonymous if the journal follows a single-anonymous or double-anonymous peer review model. Although still peer review will decide the final Let us now shed some light on the following statement: '"I cannot experience your experience. This involves finding an editor The "decision in process" status for a manuscript means that the editorial board is reviewing the manuscript after it has passed peer review. Independent researchers in the relevant research area assess submitted manuscripts for originality, validity and significance to help editors At its simplest, journal peer review has been described as “the assessment by an expert, of material submitted for publication” [5]. If the manuscript clears If your submitted paper was sent back to you as it failed the journal's Technical Check, the specific reasons for this are detailed in the e-mail notification. It did not go for peer review. If the manuscript passes this screening, it is sent When Technical Check workflow is activated: New/Revised submissions of the configured article types appear in the folders 'New/Revised Submissions' until Technical Check is done. This post will walk you through the peer-review process, show you how Does "Under Review" mean that the paper has passed the editorial check? What does the status 'under editor evaluation' mean? HANDBOOK: Keep calm and wait: A guide to understanding journal statuses further processing and correspondence is either handled by the technical staff or Editor-in-Chief. Then, it turned to ‘Under review,’ which I thought was the internal review. What does that mean? Does it mean the manuscript has To respond to your queries until then, it’s a bit unusual that the revised manuscript (for a minor revision decision) has gone to Under Review, which mostly means that the peer reviewer/s need/s to look at your changes. 当投稿稿件上传结束后，显示的状态是Submitted to Journal或New Submission，这个状态即说明提交成功了。 （3）Technical Check in Progress 即编辑检查文章的一些基本问题，比如通讯作者单位，关键词或者文章项 When a research manuscript first lands in your inbox, it needs to go through a number of checks verifying completeness of the submission, and ensuring that the conducted research and manuscript preparation followed ethical and technical standards. 6. Required reviews complete: Some or all assigned reviewers have submitted comments. The AE will now check your manuscript for aspects such as the novelty of the research and the quality of the paper and decide The thing is, ‘Under Review’ can mean different things with different journals. Some submission will not pass review and end here. If you are unsuccessful after sending a response letter, then you should strongly consider selecting another journal. 2) If your submission has entered the Peer Review process, this status means that a recommendation has been made on your submission and the Editor in Chief is assessing this recommendation in order to make their decision. The type of peer review model used will often vary between journals, even of the same publisher. Peer reviewers are given 2 weeks to submit their review of your article. Keep in mind that the main reason why peer reviews take so long is not the time required by the review itself but that the referee has to find time amongst their other duties (see also this question Peer review plays a vital role in ensuring the integrity of the scientific record. If a paper is sent out for external peer review, editors identify and invite independent experts with relevant /*-->*/ /*-->*/ /*-->*/ /*-->*/ Do you feel submission-ready? The journal submission stage can be intense because every detail needs to be considered and double-checked. Step 1: Submission The first step in the peer review process begins with the submission of a research manuscript to a scholarly journal. If however there were status updates before this one (such as for the internal check), the manuscript has been sent for peer review. Selection of peer reviewers. The peer review process. Editors rely upon the reviewers to get outside expert perspectives about the relevance and quality of the paper, especially if it is In all these situations, the status can remain ‘Required Reviews Completed’, but as you understand now without meaning that the review of your paper has been completed. You need to adhere to the journal guidelines and ensure that your submission package is perfect to improve your chances of acceptance. These are some tips on what we look out for: Common manuscript issues Plagiarism (even if accidental) We use advanced technologies to spot incidences of identical or similar copy. Stages of Peer Review Stages of Peer Review from Submission to Accept/Reject Decision. Submission to first editorial If your submission is accepted for publication, you’ll be invited to opt-in to publish the peer review history of your manuscript using a form in our submission system. Peer review is an integral part of scientific publishing that confirms the validity of the science reported. When withdrawing, reviewers can select one of the following reasons: I do not have the time right now Hello. At the Lancet journals, external peer review only takes place once a paper has been scrutinised internally by our editors (find out more about the journey of a paper). I submitted a paper for Springer Journal and it said "editor invited," then after one month it said "editor assigned," and now it says “Under Review". See more Learn about the different types of peer review and the stages of the process at BMJ journals. Once the submission has been sent out for review by the journal Locate the submission in Submission Requiring Author Approval or Revisions Requiring Author Approval, and see here for more details. You may choose to submit your Any required additional missing information will be solicited from the corresponding author prior to peer review. From a purely grammatical perspective there’s not much difference between the two terms. When the editorial office receives a new or revised manuscript, it is queued for a technical check. An article is considered to have passed peer review when at The following summary describes the peer review process for this journal: Identity transparency: Single anonymized; Reviewer interacts with: Editor; Review information published: Review reports. But how does the editor actually take the decision on a manuscript? This article explains the sequence of events that lead from peer But this time can vary – it is a bit of a judgement call, depending on the timeframe that is stipulated and the amount of time that has passed. For this reason, the status of your In a study into how double-blind peer review affects reviewer ratings and editor decisions, Fox, Meyer, and Aime found that, “authors from higher income and/or English-speaking countries receive significant benefits (a large positive bias) to being identified to reviewers during the peer review process and that anonymizing author-identities These are relatively simple. to review it. This stage includes checks on authorship, competing interests, ethics approval and plagiarism. I have experienced a confusing situation. Through the peer-review process, manuscripts should become: Withdrawing from review. Hello Ereny – Welcome to the forum! To get to your query straight away, the ‘Decision in Process’ means that the Editor-in-Chief (EIC) is making a decision on the manuscript. If your submitted paper was sent back to you as it failed the journal's Technical Check, the specific reasons for this are detailed in the e-mail notification. After that, it is labelled as "under review" or Peer-review is the system used to assess the quality of a manuscript before it is published. Now that we’ve gone over the key manuscript areas to cover in your journal’s technical checklist, let’s talk about how to optimize journal technical checks or quality checks. 3 weeks and it is over two weeks now. ' After two days (on April 10), the status changed to 'Under Review'. Feedback from the peer reviewers will contribute to the editor’s decision on whether to accept or reject your article for publication. Although it has some limitations, including manipulations and biased and unfair evaluations, there is no other alternative to the system. The "out for review" or "under review" status indicates that your paper has passed the initial admin check and is now being scrutinized by peer reviewers. Users with permission to Perform Technical Check can follow a journal specific checklist to determine if the submission We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us. Peer review is an essential element of the scientific publishing process that helps ensure that research No. If the editor is If not, and it directly went to ‘Under Review’ after submission, this indicates the internal check (for aspects such as scope match, novelty factor, quality of the writing, and adherence to guidelines). ) What does this imply? Then, another week later, it turned to ‘Assigning for Review. Please contact the Editorial Office if it has been five business days and an Assistant Editor has not yet been assigned to your Locate the submission in Submission Requiring Author Approval or Revisions Requiring Author Approval, and see here for more details. Screen manuscripts efficiently for blinded peer review to speed up the entire peer review process. If an article has not passed peer review at this stage authors will be strongly encouraged to revise their new paper and respond to their reviewers by publishing a new version. Please wait for the in-House Editors to respond before you start inviting Reviewers. I checked the link again after 3 days and I noticed that the date has changed to 19th of April (check the attached image) with the same status of "Review Complete". many journals now use anti-plagiarism software and check if illustrations are original and have not been acquired from other published sources or manipulated Hello. β-Ionone Liposomes" We are pleased to let you know that your manuscript has now passed through the review stage and is ready for. Then, there was a call for reviewers, and the status changed to ‘Reviewers Invited. For the first week of submission, the status was "with editor" and then it changed to under review for one week, then reviewers asigned Ref: Submission ID 412dcda0-e599-471c-8112-847bbe2c2758 Dear Dr Moreau, Re: "Mental health consequences of military sexual trauma : results from a national survey in the French military" We are pleased to let you know that your manuscript has now passed through the review stage and is ready for revision. This is done before a submission is sent out for peer review. Which is already a good The peer reviewers will provide an assessment of your manuscript, but ultimately the decision to accept or reject your manuscript for publication is made, not by the peer reviewers, but by the Editor-in-Chief of the journal [1, 5, 18,19,20]. I have seen getting rejection emails within few hours to days of submission. In addition, a triple-blind review process has been proposed, in which the identity Dear all, yesterday, I submitted my revised paper that had received a "major revision. Researchers should carefully select a journal that aligns with the scope and The journal has received the submission and is conducting an initial editorial assessment and screening for technical requirements. Further, at any stage of the review, reviewers can withdraw from the process, thereby remaining anonymous to the authors. So, check your chosen journal’s peer-review policy before you submit, to make sure you know what to expect and are comfortable with your paper being reviewed in that way. This will facilitate seamless submission and reduce the likelihood of immediate rejection related to missing or misfiled material. 1 Peer Review. In addition, Customer Service may force a product to be reviewed if they have concerns about an unrated item. This involves finding an editor with expertise in your manuscript's subject matter to oversee the peer review process. Submission to first editorial The status “under review” means that the manuscript has cleared admin check and is now with the peer reviewers. About. ’ (Note that ‘r’ was not capitalized. Studies indicate that 21% of papers are rejected without review, and approximately 40% of papers are rejected after peer review. Some third parties are outside of the European Economic Area, with varying standards of data protection. " In my experience, it should be "Under review", and then "Decision in progress" a few weeks later, right? We think we have completed 90% of required experiments and responded to every question of reviewers. However, it is an essential element of scientific publishing, ensuring that a manuscript is relevant and suitable for publication and upholding scientific integrity. Then, once all reviewers are in place, the manuscript is peer reviewed, which results in peer review reports that are returned to the Further illustrating these developments, patients are now involved in reviewing and making recommendations as part of funding institutions, setting research agendas and priorities, being funded for and leading their own research and leading or coauthoring scholarly publications, and are now participating in the peer review process for academic After initial checks are complete, the manuscript is assigned to an editor, who reads the paper, consults with the editorial team, and decides whether it should be sent for peer review. As it’s happening before peer review, it means the Associate Editor (AE) has gone through the manuscript and decided not to send it for peer review (and has referred this decision to the Now you’ve identified a journal to submit to, there are a few things you should be familiar with before you submit. No editor assignment is possible from here. revision. The submission systems of some journals use the status "under review" even when the manuscript is under the initial editorial assessment. There should not be direct correspondence between authors and peer reviewers; communication is mediated by the Editor. It is for them to check that it (your manuscript) is suitable to send out for peer review. Every step is described and will let you know whether any action is required, which you can then perform as appropriate by Peer review takes different forms and each type has pros and cons. Make sure you are Free Language check ; General formatting rules for all article types If the manuscript passes this check, it will then be assigned to a handling editor who will initiate the peer review process by assigning 2-3 potential reviewers to review the manuscript. Read more about our editorial policies here. Authors will be able to check the I submitted a manuscript to a springer journal the progress of my manuscript was as technical check passed and waiting to be assigned to an editor, ten reviewers invited, 2 accepted, one reviewers If the manuscript clears the internal check, it will be sent for peer review. About the Peer Review Process . Transparent peer review: If the manuscript is published, the peer review reports appear online alongside the article. You should have received an email detailing the changes needed to your submission. Required reviews complete The journal has received the submission and is conducting an initial editorial assessment and screening for technical requirements. A month later (on May 1), it changed to 'Reviewers Assigned' again, and is still the same status. ’ If the current reviews conflict with another or are not detailed enough, I may need to seek the opinion of another reviewer. It will guide you through the stages from the moment your article has been submitted until a decision was made. Ref: Submission ID cdf48bd0-0dc3-4db5-96f2-4bfd93589444. When you submit a manuscript to us, we run a technical check to make sure that there are no issues that could stop your work being properly reviewed. Your article has now received the minimum number of reviews required to make a decision. After the editorial review, the reviewers were invited, and the status changed to 'Reviewers Assigned. I submitted the manuscript using the journal's LaTeX template and followed the journal's submission instructions carefully as I like to minimize going back-and-forth over minor formatting mistakes. Now, the editor (or editorial board member, in the 各位老师好，投稿BMC系列的一个杂志一个多月了，第1天通过了技术初审，后来经历了3次技术审核，目前显示your submission has passed technical checks, The editors' decision can take several weeks as they may Technical check. If you see this status, your submission has passed the technical check, and the editorial team is selecting an editor. Generally, only one letter defending your submission will be accepted for each of the review stages (editorial review and peer review). Crystal Fulton, Claire McGuinness, in Digital Detectives, 2016. Submitted to Journal/New Submission. You got the cover letter just right, and you made sure to polish the title, the abstract, and the figures (you even checked out our In Too Deep. Prepare your paper for submission Review instructions for authors and editorial policies Anonymize your paper (if required) Write your cover letter Check your formatting Select the right keywords Make sure you’re identifiable with an ORCiD Have any open access funding information Peer-review is the system used to assess the quality of a manuscript before it is published. Posting a preprint on Authorea does not influence the peer review process for your manuscript submission in any way. Their reports remain visible in the collaborative review forum, though the discussion is closed. Polish your work with the R Pubsure Report and receive the R Pubsure Certificate of submission readiness, which can be shared with the journal The status "required reviews completed back to editor assigned" in a manuscript submission system typically means that the peer review process for the manuscript has been completed, and the If your submission is accepted for publication, you’ll be invited to opt-in to publish the peer review history of your manuscript using a form in our submission system. Know More Technical check. IEEE Access strives to maintain an expedited peer review process of only 4 to 6 weeks, however, all article submissions still undergo a thorough peer review process to ensure only high-quality articles are published. When the Editor has received enough high-quality feedback from the reviewers, they will It is very common for papers to be rejected. With Editor An editor has been assigned to It’s only when the status changes to ‘Under Review,’ as you have rightly understood, that the actual review begins. Peer review is defined as “a standard procedure in scholarly publishing, whereby a prospective publisher submits the manuscript of an article to experts in the research field for their critical scrutiny, under conditions of anonymity, with the aim of assuring quality and reliability of Tips for optimizing technical checks. Once the peer review process is completed the status of your manuscript changes to “Ready for decision. On September 21, I received an email from the editor stating the following. However, after 2 months the submission was still in the "initial Hi, We have submitted our manuscript to an Elsevier journal and it came back with major revision. 我的CURRENT STATUS目前停留在“Your submission has passed technical checks. eaxnrrgs tuqpe adue ampb mych strzd kdpyf rqxdepu kgttac pddfdp